1. Introduction to NVMe Technology

Users benefit from the increased speed and traditional Slowloris DoS attacks can be less effective because they rely on holding up the web servers through lack of available RAM. NVMe powering results in fast SQL to deliver fast results, accompanied by rapid MySQL responses to serve visitor resources – a result steadily affected by SQL. But, not even the SQL server or the visitor server contain huge gigabytes of memory; however, similarly, using NVMe hosting to provide a substantial performance improvement so that reasonable results for average or slow page requests are virtually instantaneous can be achieved.

NVMe allows for massive improvements in performance, with read speeds of 2500MB/s a familiar sight. NVMe permits a database server to operate effectively, with complex requests served promptly and the execution time needed to serve complex scripts; most significantly, this increased storage speed creates an environment for PHP execution that significantly outperforms a previous LAMP stack through output buffering.

The upcoming introduction of the new Enterprise Next-Gen NVMe Tier for shared and business web hosting packages hosted on the superior speed of NVMe solid-state drives is a key USP of the powerful website hosting solutions. This superior hosting upgrade will keep the host well stuck at the top of the critical web hosting industry. The sheer power of the new enterprise NVMe tier can really get a business to fly. Shared web servers will work at up to 10 times the speed, with enhanced performance through reduced file load times, processed data latencies, and superior data transfer speeds.

2. Understanding Shared Web Hosting

One of the reasons why shared hosting is so popular is that it often supports the most common web development tools as well as being user-friendly. cPanel, one of the most popular control panels currently in use, ships with a plethora of themes and graphical user interfaces (GUIs). It is almost infinitely customizable, making it ideal for newbies as well as experienced developers, while our Softaculous auto-installer has a library with more than 400 applications where users can install any CMS or framework in just seconds. The possibilities to customize the installed applications on their host space are innumerable. On top of that, with shared hosting, the responsibility of keeping the server up-to-date falls on the shoulders of the hosting company. Additional services include auto-backups and auto-updates, guaranteeing the safety and smooth running of the website. It is not necessary for the user to be tech-savvy or have any sort of previous experience in managing a server. The shared hosting environment and the wealth of services that come together create a feeling of safety and reliability that is extremely important for anyone who makes a living or business on the internet.

For many first-time website builders, bloggers, and small e-commerce businesses, shared web hosting offers a welcome mix of value, cost-effectiveness, and features. More than 75% of overall server deployments utilize this technology. A great physical server can be efficiently shared among multiple tenants, with each basically renting a part of the server to host their website. These sites operate independently of one another and cannot access the resources of other websites on the server. This solution provides numerous benefits that come highly recommended, especially for those with a tight budget and looking to host their site at a low cost. The potential drawbacks of shared hosting are limited to possible performance issues if one of the other sites on the host server acquires a large and/or sudden traffic spike.

3. Benefits of NVMe-Powered Shared Hosting

Short boot and loading times The single most crucial factor Ultra-high IOPS and near-zero latency Faster PHP performance, site speed, and increased traffic Instant WordPress replicas with faster file transfers Faster and more efficient media management Reduced page load times for a better user experience Open source or commercial control panel with enterprise-grade features

No matter the size or type of organization you serve, an enterprise's website is an essential business tool. When choosing a shared web hosting plan for a new or existing WordPress website, it is critical to consider both website performance and loading times. Furthermore, the hosting option you choose, be it traditional and cheaper SATA SSD-powered or more reliable and faster NVMe-powered, will have a direct effect on the overall website performance. The following are the primary benefits of choosing an NVMe-powered shared web hosting plan over a traditional SATA SSD-powered shared plan.

4. Performance Comparison with Traditional Hosting Solutions

Outcomes that we will measure: - cPanel Staging website creation (to allow for parallel work by Devs and QA) - File changes in all supported website portals - VSS snapshot creation point in time - Console feedback setting up automatic database backup options - Promotion of a website from staging to production - Magical migration of large website CMS updates to prevent overwriting user content within the /www directory. For simplicity index.php automatically outputs a variable limitation with header("HTTP/1.1 503 Authorization Denied"). Our shared hosting setup will differ where the existing content consists of the CMS release before the upgrade process occurs. Upon read-only studio acceptance, the Dev/Commit process can then be started following a code freeze on the development servers. Our servers should then need to perform a manual web server /www -> /wwwupgrade with root privileges on the dynamic system load monitor and reboot the individual website server node upon upgrade PHP version to the LTS version for more security as the home sites are entirely run in a secure scage. Framework scripting packages work in the graceful state and complete /www ---> /wwwprep with staging functionality for Unclespike. officialfor adapter upgrade and testing within the hosted website and are slowly tested where the staging environment allows for direct access to the legacy hosted environment with this test site and does not impact neighboring sites. Unit tests and visual browser tests are then performed following last-minute publisher examinations before the limitations are lifted and the web server is introduced, complete without interrupting neighboring site code development cycles.

For the comparison, cPanel restores will be grouped together, onto the hardware RAID, and time-taken measurements will be obtained for both types of hosting. Due to the tiered hardware design in the NVMe shared hosting, there will be some discrepancy in website load times at the point where the HDD cache tier is not holding the website data required to serve the web pages. Such latencies only open an element of the delay in rendering the website and website performance falls into a category of "degraded" rather than "quiescent" where the "degraded" state is substantially providing a similar experience of a loaded page. For the evaluation, all test cases considered for the legacy system versus the new NVMe powered system did not.

In the legacy shared hosting stack, our machines are using LSI hardware RAID for filesystem storage. Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) is being used to create regular VSS snapshots at an interval of five hours. For the new environment, a shared scratch high capacity tier is aggregated using HDDs with a fast NVMe cache. All website data will have their SSD cache immediately upon use upon the NVMe with storage in the high-capacity tier and a further VSS snapshot can be performed, therefore minimizing the time spent scanning files on the storage. We have thus managed to implement a similar setup to the traditional hosting hardware but without the web server needing to wait during the backup process for tagging of the in-use data in the NVMe cache.

Next, we will compare the performance of a traditional cPanel shared hosting with an NVMe-powered cPanel shared hosting. The software stack comparison is as follows.

5. Conclusion and Future Implications

As future work, we will employ other tests and help visualize improvements in running more complex but I/O intensive applications such as big data platforms in web hosting. This can happen because, although time response improvements in interactions between data and MySQL server were not expressive in the WordPress or requests to cache similar operations in kernel space, there was still a reduction in disk wait time and better SSD disk performance in general, given that these improvements are highlighted when executing PHP-stack and disk-heavy workloads such that associated technologies are assets for semi-CI deployment flat, used in AI and DevOps. They can even return benefits through Docker. After carrying out these complex tests, the next step is to carry out an extensive semi-CI evaluation, that is, a continuous integration script when committing infrastructure changes, and running concurrent I/O intensive workloads in NVMe, tracking both the resources of the SATA SSD and the benefits in space, performance, and equivalent service time. Finally, to derive the impacts caused by this research, we will study the use of NVMe in development, private cloud, and CI/CD environments.

In this work, we empirically evaluate, through a pilot empirical study, the benefits of upgrading the storage of shared hosting environment to NVMe. We evaluate the benefits by comparing the time it takes to run two common usage scenarios: website load tests and WordPress automated benchmark. Such scenarios are common for public web hosting providers. The load tests measure the time the server's cache speeds up request serving. The WordPress custom benchmark measures disk read time, page render time, and MySQL server request handling time. Both workloads were executed in two different configurations with the same hardware, network infrastructure, and client presets. However, one of them has NVMe disks while the other has SATA SSD while both have the same I/O workload by the scenario. Our results point out a significant improvement in cache and data serving with NVMe and a minor improvement in MySQL server request handling time. These results could be easily identified during the qualitative tests performed after the scenarios and indicated a possible improvement in application time response that was not well mapped through the WordPress scenario. Since both NVMe and SATA SSD reach high speed in exempting the storage from the critical path, it is difficult to visualize only running timer-based scenarios. We conclude that although time does not improve much, NVMe maintains performance levels in all storage steps.

References:

Haas, G. and Leis, V. "What Modern NVMe Storage Can Do, and How to Exploit It: High-Performance I/O for High-Performance Storage Engines." Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2023. vldb.org

Sun, Hui, et al. "Co-active: A workload-aware collaborative cache management scheme for NVMe SSDs." IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 32.6 (2021): 1437-1451. ieee.org

Ziegler, Tobias, Carsten Binnig, and Viktor Leis. "ScaleStore: A fast and cost-efficient storage engine using DRAM, NVMe, and RDMA." Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data. 2022. tu-darmstadt.de

Li, Qiong, et al. "NV-BSP: A Burst I/O Storage Pool Based on NVMe SSDs." Advanced Computer Architecture: 13th Conference, ACA 2020, Kunming, China, August 13–15, 2020, Proceedings 13. Springer Singapore, 2020. [HTML]

Liu, Weiguang, et al. "A space-efficient fair cache scheme based on machine learning for NVMe SSDs." IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 34.1 (2022): 383-399. [HTML]